Twisted K-theory

In mathematics, twisted K-theory (also called K-theory with local coefficients[1]) is a variation on K-theory, a mathematical theory from the 1950s that spans algebraic topology, abstract algebra and operator theory.

More specifically, twisted K-theory with twist H is a particular variant of K-theory, in which the twist is given by an integral 3-dimensional cohomology class. It is special among the various twists that K-theory admits for two reasons. First, it admits a geometric formulation. This was provided in two steps; the first one was done in 1970 (Publ. Math. de l'IHÉS) by Peter Donovan and Max Karoubi; the second one in 1988 by Jonathan Rosenberg in Continuous-Trace Algebras from the Bundle Theoretic Point of View.

In physics, it has been conjectured to classify D-branes, Ramond-Ramond field strengths and in some cases even spinors in type II string theory. For more information on twisted K-theory in string theory, see K-theory (physics).

In the broader context of K-theory, in each subject it has numerous isomorphic formulations and, in many cases, isomorphisms relating definitions in various subjects have been proven. It also has numerous deformations, for example, in abstract algebra K-theory may be twisted by any integral cohomology class.

Definition

To motivate Rosenberg's geometric formulation of twisted K-theory, start from the Atiyah–Jänich theorem, stating that

F r e d ( H ) , {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}}),}

the Fredholm operators on Hilbert space H {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}} , is a classifying space for ordinary, untwisted K-theory. This means that the K-theory of the space M {\displaystyle M} consists of the homotopy classes of maps

[ M F r e d ( H ) ] {\displaystyle [M\rightarrow Fred({\mathcal {H}})]}

from M {\displaystyle M} to F r e d ( H ) . {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}}).}

A slightly more complicated way of saying the same thing is as follows. Consider the trivial bundle of F r e d ( H ) {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}})} over M {\displaystyle M} , that is, the Cartesian product of M {\displaystyle M} and F r e d ( H ) {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}})} . Then the K-theory of M {\displaystyle M} consists of the homotopy classes of sections of this bundle.

We can make this yet more complicated by introducing a trivial

P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})}

bundle P {\displaystyle P} over M {\displaystyle M} , where P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} is the group of projective unitary operators on the Hilbert space H {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}} . Then the group of maps

[ P F r e d ( H ) ] P U ( H ) {\displaystyle [P\rightarrow Fred({\mathcal {H}})]_{PU({\mathcal {H}})}}

from P {\displaystyle P} to F r e d ( H ) {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}})} which are equivariant under an action of P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} is equivalent to the original groups of maps

[ M F r e d ( H ) ] . {\displaystyle [M\rightarrow Fred({\mathcal {H}})].}

This more complicated construction of ordinary K-theory is naturally generalized to the twisted case. To see this, note that P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} bundles on M {\displaystyle M} are classified by elements H {\displaystyle H} of the third integral cohomology group of M {\displaystyle M} . This is a consequence of the fact that P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} topologically is a representative Eilenberg–MacLane space

K ( Z , 3 ) {\displaystyle K(\mathbf {Z} ,3)} .

The generalization is then straightforward. Rosenberg has defined

K H ( M ) {\displaystyle K_{H}(M)} ,

the twisted K-theory of M {\displaystyle M} with twist given by the 3-class H {\displaystyle H} , to be the space of homotopy classes of sections of the trivial F r e d ( H ) {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}})} bundle over M {\displaystyle M} that are covariant with respect to a P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} bundle P H {\displaystyle P_{H}} fibered over M {\displaystyle M} with 3-class H {\displaystyle H} , that is

K H ( M ) = [ P H F r e d ( H ) ] P U ( H ) . {\displaystyle K_{H}(M)=[P_{H}\rightarrow Fred({\mathcal {H}})]_{PU({\mathcal {H}})}.}

Equivalently, it is the space of homotopy classes of sections of the F r e d ( H ) {\displaystyle Fred({\mathcal {H}})} bundles associated to a P U ( H ) {\displaystyle PU({\mathcal {H}})} bundle with class H {\displaystyle H} .

Relation to K-theory

When H {\displaystyle H} is the trivial class, twisted K-theory is just untwisted K-theory, which is a ring. However, when H {\displaystyle H} is nontrivial this theory is no longer a ring. It has an addition, but it is no longer closed under multiplication.

However, the direct sum of the twisted K-theories of M {\displaystyle M} with all possible twists is a ring. In particular, the product of an element of K-theory with twist H {\displaystyle H} with an element of K-theory with twist H {\displaystyle H'} is an element of K-theory twisted by H + H {\displaystyle H+H'} . This element can be constructed directly from the above definition by using adjoints of Fredholm operators and construct a specific 2 x 2 matrix out of them (see the reference 1, where a more natural and general Z/2-graded version is also presented). In particular twisted K-theory is a module over classical K-theory.

Calculations

Physicist typically want to calculate twisted K-theory using the Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence.[2] The idea is that one begins with all of the even or all of the odd integral cohomology, depending on whether one wishes to calculate the twisted K 0 {\displaystyle K_{0}} or the twisted K 0 {\displaystyle K^{0}} , and then one takes the cohomology with respect to a series of differential operators. The first operator, d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} , for example, is the sum of the three-class H {\displaystyle H} , which in string theory corresponds to the Neveu-Schwarz 3-form, and the third Steenrod square,[3] so

d 3 p , q = S q 3 + H {\displaystyle d_{3}^{p,q}=Sq^{3}+H}

No elementary form for the next operator, d 5 {\displaystyle d_{5}} , has been found, although several conjectured forms exist. Higher operators do not contribute to the K {\displaystyle K} -theory of a 10-manifold, which is the dimension of interest in critical superstring theory. Over the rationals Michael Atiyah and Graeme Segal have shown that all of the differentials reduce to Massey products of M {\displaystyle M} .[4]

After taking the cohomology with respect to the full series of differentials one obtains twisted K {\displaystyle K} -theory as a set, but to obtain the full group structure one in general needs to solve an extension problem.

Example: the three-sphere

The three-sphere, S 3 {\displaystyle S^{3}} , has trivial cohomology except for H 0 ( S 3 ) {\displaystyle H^{0}(S^{3})} and H 3 ( S 3 ) {\displaystyle H^{3}(S^{3})} which are both isomorphic to the integers. Thus the even and odd cohomologies are both isomorphic to the integers. Because the three-sphere is of dimension three, which is less than five, the third Steenrod square is trivial on its cohomology and so the first nontrivial differential is just d 5 = H {\displaystyle d_{5}=H} . The later differentials increase the degree of a cohomology class by more than three and so are again trivial; thus the twisted K {\displaystyle K} -theory is just the cohomology of the operator d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} which acts on a class by cupping it with the 3-class H {\displaystyle H} .

Imagine that H {\displaystyle H} is the trivial class, zero. Then d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} is also trivial. Thus its entire domain is its kernel, and nothing is in its image. Thus K H 0 ( S 3 ) {\displaystyle K_{H}^{0}(S^{3})} is the kernel of d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} in the even cohomology, which is the full even cohomology, which consists of the integers. Similarly K H 1 ( S 3 ) {\displaystyle K_{H}^{1}(S^{3})} consists of the odd cohomology quotiented by the image of d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} , in other words quotiented by the trivial group. This leaves the original odd cohomology, which is again the integers. In conclusion, K 0 {\displaystyle K^{0}} and K 1 {\displaystyle K^{1}} of the three-sphere with trivial twist are both isomorphic to the integers. As expected, this agrees with the untwisted K {\displaystyle K} -theory.

Now consider the case in which H {\displaystyle H} is nontrivial. H {\displaystyle H} is defined to be an element of the third integral cohomology, which is isomorphic to the integers. Thus H {\displaystyle H} corresponds to a number, which we will call n {\displaystyle n} . d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} now takes an element m {\displaystyle m} of H 0 {\displaystyle H^{0}} and yields the element n m {\displaystyle nm} of H 3 {\displaystyle H^{3}} . As n {\displaystyle n} is not equal to zero by assumption, the only element of the kernel of d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} is the zero element, and so K H = n 0 ( S 3 ) = 0 {\displaystyle K_{H=n}^{0}(S^{3})=0} . The image of d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} consists of all elements of the integers that are multiples of n {\displaystyle n} . Therefore, the odd cohomology, Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } , quotiented by the image of d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} , n Z {\displaystyle n\mathbb {Z} } , is the cyclic group of order n {\displaystyle n} , Z / n {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /n} . In conclusion

K H = n 1 ( S 3 ) = Z / n {\displaystyle K_{H=n}^{1}(S^{3})=\mathbb {Z} /n}

In string theory this result reproduces the classification of D-branes on the 3-sphere with n {\displaystyle n} units of H {\displaystyle H} -flux, which corresponds to the set of symmetric boundary conditions in the supersymmetric S U ( 2 ) {\displaystyle SU(2)} WZW model at level n 2 {\displaystyle n-2} .

There is an extension of this calculation to the group manifold of SU(3).[5] In this case the Steenrod square term in d 3 {\displaystyle d_{3}} , the operator d 5 {\displaystyle d_{5}} , and the extension problem are nontrivial.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Donavan, Peter; Karoubi, Max (1970). "Graded Brauer groups and $K$-theory with local coefficients". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 38: 5–25.
  2. ^ A guide to such calculations in the case of twisted K-theory can be found in E8 Gauge Theory, and a Derivation of K-Theory from M-Theory by Emanuel Diaconescu, Gregory Moore and Edward Witten (DMW).
  3. ^ (DMW) also provide a crash course in Steenrod squares for physicists.
  4. ^ In Twisted K-theory and cohomology.
  5. ^ In D-Brane Instantons and K-Theory Charges by Juan Maldacena, Gregory Moore and Nathan Seiberg.

References

  • "Graded Brauer groups and K-theory with local coefficients", by Peter Donovan and Max Karoubi. Publ. Math. IHÉS Nr. 38, pp. 5–25 (1970).
  • D-Brane Instantons and K-Theory Charges by Juan Maldacena, Gregory Moore and Nathan Seiberg
  • Twisted K-theory and Cohomology by Michael Atiyah and Graeme Segal
  • Twisted K-theory and the K-theory of Bundle Gerbes by Peter Bouwknegt, Alan Carey, Varghese Mathai, Michael Murray and Danny Stevenson.
  • Twisted K-theory, old and new

External links

  • Strings 2002, Michael Atiyah lecture, "Twisted K-theory and physics"
  • The Verlinde algebra is twisted equivariant K-theory (PDF)
  • Riemann–Roch and index formulae in twisted K-theory (PDF)
  • v
  • t
  • e
Background
TheoryString dualityParticles and fieldsBranesConformal field theoryGauge theoryGeometrySupersymmetryHolographyM-theory
String theorists