Zariski's lemma

In algebra, Zariski's lemma, proved by Oscar Zariski (1947), states that, if a field K is finitely generated as an associative algebra over another field k, then K is a finite field extension of k (that is, it is also finitely generated as a vector space).

An important application of the lemma is a proof of the weak form of Hilbert's Nullstellensatz:[1] if I is a proper ideal of k [ t 1 , . . . , t n ] {\displaystyle k[t_{1},...,t_{n}]} (k an algebraically closed field), then I has a zero; i.e., there is a point x in k n {\displaystyle k^{n}} such that f ( x ) = 0 {\displaystyle f(x)=0} for all f in I. (Proof: replacing I by a maximal ideal m {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}} , we can assume I = m {\displaystyle I={\mathfrak {m}}} is maximal. Let A = k [ t 1 , . . . , t n ] {\displaystyle A=k[t_{1},...,t_{n}]} and ϕ : A A / m {\displaystyle \phi :A\to A/{\mathfrak {m}}} be the natural surjection. By the lemma A / m {\displaystyle A/{\mathfrak {m}}} is a finite extension. Since k is algebraically closed that extension must be k. Then for any f m {\displaystyle f\in {\mathfrak {m}}} ,

f ( ϕ ( t 1 ) , , ϕ ( t n ) ) = ϕ ( f ( t 1 , , t n ) ) = 0 {\displaystyle f(\phi (t_{1}),\cdots ,\phi (t_{n}))=\phi (f(t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n}))=0} ;

that is to say, x = ( ϕ ( t 1 ) , , ϕ ( t n ) ) {\displaystyle x=(\phi (t_{1}),\cdots ,\phi (t_{n}))} is a zero of m {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}} .)

The lemma may also be understood from the following perspective. In general, a ring R is a Jacobson ring if and only if every finitely generated R-algebra that is a field is finite over R.[2] Thus, the lemma follows from the fact that a field is a Jacobson ring.

Proofs

Two direct proofs, one of which is due to Zariski, are given in Atiyah–MacDonald.[3][4] For Zariski's original proof, see the original paper.[5] Another direct proof in the language of Jacobson rings is given below. The lemma is also a consequence of the Noether normalization lemma. Indeed, by the normalization lemma, K is a finite module over the polynomial ring k [ x 1 , , x d ] {\displaystyle k[x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d}]} where x 1 , , x d {\displaystyle x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d}} are elements of K that are algebraically independent over k. But since K has Krull dimension zero and since an integral ring extension (e.g., a finite ring extension) preserves Krull dimensions, the polynomial ring must have dimension zero; i.e., d = 0 {\displaystyle d=0} .

The following characterization of a Jacobson ring contains Zariski's lemma as a special case. Recall that a ring is a Jacobson ring if every prime ideal is an intersection of maximal ideals. (When A is a field, A is a Jacobson ring and the theorem below is precisely Zariski's lemma.)

Theorem — [2] Let A be a ring. Then the following are equivalent.

  1. A is a Jacobson ring.
  2. Every finitely generated A-algebra B that is a field is finite over A.

Proof: 2. {\displaystyle \Rightarrow } 1.: Let p {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}} be a prime ideal of A and set B = A / p {\displaystyle B=A/{\mathfrak {p}}} . We need to show the Jacobson radical of B is zero. For that end, let f be a nonzero element of B. Let m {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}} be a maximal ideal of the localization B [ f 1 ] {\displaystyle B[f^{-1}]} . Then B [ f 1 ] / m {\displaystyle B[f^{-1}]/{\mathfrak {m}}} is a field that is a finitely generated A-algebra and so is finite over A by assumption; thus it is finite over B = A / p {\displaystyle B=A/{\mathfrak {p}}} and so is finite over the subring B / q {\displaystyle B/{\mathfrak {q}}} where q = m B {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {q}}={\mathfrak {m}}\cap B} . By integrality, q {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {q}}} is a maximal ideal not containing f.

1. {\displaystyle \Rightarrow } 2.: Since a factor ring of a Jacobson ring is Jacobson, we can assume B contains A as a subring. Then the assertion is a consequence of the next algebraic fact:

(*) Let B A {\displaystyle B\supseteq A} be integral domains such that B is finitely generated as A-algebra. Then there exists a nonzero a in A such that every ring homomorphism ϕ : A K {\displaystyle \phi :A\to K} , K an algebraically closed field, with ϕ ( a ) 0 {\displaystyle \phi (a)\neq 0} extends to ϕ ~ : B K {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}:B\to K} .

Indeed, choose a maximal ideal m {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}} of A not containing a. Writing K for some algebraic closure of A / m {\displaystyle A/{\mathfrak {m}}} , the canonical map ϕ : A A / m K {\displaystyle \phi :A\to A/{\mathfrak {m}}\hookrightarrow K} extends to ϕ ~ : B K {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}:B\to K} . Since B is a field, ϕ ~ {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}} is injective and so B is algebraic (thus finite algebraic) over A / m {\displaystyle A/{\mathfrak {m}}} . We now prove (*). If B contains an element that is transcendental over A, then it contains a polynomial ring over A to which φ extends (without a requirement on a) and so we can assume B is algebraic over A (by Zorn's lemma, say). Let x 1 , , x r {\displaystyle x_{1},\dots ,x_{r}} be the generators of B as A-algebra. Then each x i {\displaystyle x_{i}} satisfies the relation

a i 0 x i n + a i 1 x i n 1 + + a i n = 0 , a i j A {\displaystyle a_{i0}x_{i}^{n}+a_{i1}x_{i}^{n-1}+\dots +a_{in}=0,\,\,a_{ij}\in A}

where n depends on i and a i 0 0 {\displaystyle a_{i0}\neq 0} . Set a = a 10 a 20 a r 0 {\displaystyle a=a_{10}a_{20}\dots a_{r0}} . Then B [ a 1 ] {\displaystyle B[a^{-1}]} is integral over A [ a 1 ] {\displaystyle A[a^{-1}]} . Now given ϕ : A K {\displaystyle \phi :A\to K} , we first extend it to ϕ ~ : A [ a 1 ] K {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}:A[a^{-1}]\to K} by setting ϕ ~ ( a 1 ) = ϕ ( a ) 1 {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}(a^{-1})=\phi (a)^{-1}} . Next, let m = ker ϕ ~ {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}=\operatorname {ker} {\widetilde {\phi }}} . By integrality, m = n A [ a 1 ] {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}={\mathfrak {n}}\cap A[a^{-1}]} for some maximal ideal n {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {n}}} of B [ a 1 ] {\displaystyle B[a^{-1}]} . Then ϕ ~ : A [ a 1 ] A [ a 1 ] / m K {\displaystyle {\widetilde {\phi }}:A[a^{-1}]\to A[a^{-1}]/{\mathfrak {m}}\to K} extends to B [ a 1 ] B [ a 1 ] / n K {\displaystyle B[a^{-1}]\to B[a^{-1}]/{\mathfrak {n}}\to K} . Restrict the last map to B to finish the proof. {\displaystyle \square }

Notes

  1. ^ Milne 2017, Theorem 2.12.
  2. ^ a b Atiyah & MacDonald 1969, Ch 5. Exercise 25.
  3. ^ Atiyah & MacDonald 1969, Ch 5. Exercise 18.
  4. ^ Atiyah & MacDonald 1969, Proposition 7.9.
  5. ^ Zariski 1947, pp. 362–368.

Sources

  • Atiyah, Michael; MacDonald, Ian G. (1969). Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Addison-Wesley Series in Mathematics. Addison–Wesley. ISBN 0-201-40751-5.
  • Milne, James (19 March 2017). "Algebraic Geometry". Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  • Zariski, Oscar (April 1947). "A new proof of Hilbert's Nullstellensatz". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 53 (4): 362–368. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1947-08801-7. MR 0020075.