Theorem of the highest weight

In representation theory, a branch of mathematics, the theorem of the highest weight classifies the irreducible representations of a complex semisimple Lie algebra g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} .[1][2] There is a closely related theorem classifying the irreducible representations of a connected compact Lie group K {\displaystyle K} .[3] The theorem states that there is a bijection

λ [ V λ ] {\displaystyle \lambda \mapsto [V^{\lambda }]}

from the set of "dominant integral elements" to the set of equivalence classes of irreducible representations of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} or K {\displaystyle K} . The difference between the two results is in the precise notion of "integral" in the definition of a dominant integral element. If K {\displaystyle K} is simply connected, this distinction disappears.

The theorem was originally proved by Élie Cartan in his 1913 paper.[4] The version of the theorem for a compact Lie group is due to Hermann Weyl. The theorem is one of the key pieces of representation theory of semisimple Lie algebras.

Statement

Lie algebra case

Let g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} be a finite-dimensional semisimple complex Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra h {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {h}}} . Let R {\displaystyle R} be the associated root system. We then say that an element λ h {\displaystyle \lambda \in {\mathfrak {h}}^{*}} is integral[5] if

2 λ , α α , α {\displaystyle 2{\frac {\langle \lambda ,\alpha \rangle }{\langle \alpha ,\alpha \rangle }}}

is an integer for each root α {\displaystyle \alpha } . Next, we choose a set R + {\displaystyle R^{+}} of positive roots and we say that an element λ h {\displaystyle \lambda \in {\mathfrak {h}}^{*}} is dominant if λ , α 0 {\displaystyle \langle \lambda ,\alpha \rangle \geq 0} for all α R + {\displaystyle \alpha \in R^{+}} . An element λ h {\displaystyle \lambda \in {\mathfrak {h}}^{*}} dominant integral if it is both dominant and integral. Finally, if λ {\displaystyle \lambda } and μ {\displaystyle \mu } are in h {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {h}}^{*}} , we say that λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is higher[6] than μ {\displaystyle \mu } if λ μ {\displaystyle \lambda -\mu } is expressible as a linear combination of positive roots with non-negative real coefficients.

A weight λ {\displaystyle \lambda } of a representation V {\displaystyle V} of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} is then called a highest weight if λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is higher than every other weight μ {\displaystyle \mu } of V {\displaystyle V} .

The theorem of the highest weight then states:[2]

  • If V {\displaystyle V} is a finite-dimensional irreducible representation of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} , then V {\displaystyle V} has a unique highest weight, and this highest weight is dominant integral.
  • If two finite-dimensional irreducible representations have the same highest weight, they are isomorphic.
  • For each dominant integral element λ {\displaystyle \lambda } , there exists a finite-dimensional irreducible representation with highest weight λ {\displaystyle \lambda } .

The most difficult part is the last one; the construction of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation with a prescribed highest weight.

The compact group case

Let K {\displaystyle K} be a connected compact Lie group with Lie algebra k {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {k}}} and let g := k + i k {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}:={\mathfrak {k}}+i{\mathfrak {k}}} be the complexification of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} . Let T {\displaystyle T} be a maximal torus in K {\displaystyle K} with Lie algebra t {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {t}}} . Then h := t + i t {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {h}}:={\mathfrak {t}}+i{\mathfrak {t}}} is a Cartan subalgebra of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} , and we may form the associated root system R {\displaystyle R} . The theory then proceeds in much the same way as in the Lie algebra case, with one crucial difference: the notion of integrality is different. Specifically, we say that an element λ h {\displaystyle \lambda \in {\mathfrak {h}}} is analytically integral[7] if

λ , H {\displaystyle \langle \lambda ,H\rangle }

is an integer whenever

e 2 π H = I {\displaystyle e^{2\pi H}=I}

where I {\displaystyle I} is the identity element of K {\displaystyle K} . Every analytically integral element is integral in the Lie algebra sense,[8] but there may be integral elements in the Lie algebra sense that are not analytically integral. This distinction reflects the fact that if K {\displaystyle K} is not simply connected, there may be representations of g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} that do not come from representations of K {\displaystyle K} . On the other hand, if K {\displaystyle K} is simply connected, the notions of "integral" and "analytically integral" coincide.[3]

The theorem of the highest weight for representations of K {\displaystyle K} [9] is then the same as in the Lie algebra case, except that "integral" is replaced by "analytically integral."

Proofs

There are at least four proofs:

  • Hermann Weyl's original proof from the compact group point of view,[10] based on the Weyl character formula and the Peter–Weyl theorem.
  • The theory of Verma modules contains the highest weight theorem. This is the approach taken in many standard textbooks (e.g., Humphreys and Part II of Hall).
  • The Borel–Weil–Bott theorem constructs an irreducible representation as the space of global sections of an ample line bundle; the highest weight theorem results as a consequence. (The approach uses a fair bit of algebraic geometry but yields a very quick proof.)
  • The invariant theoretic approach: one constructs irreducible representations as subrepresentations of a tensor power of the standard representations. This approach is essentially due to H. Weyl and works quite well for classical groups.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Dixmier 1996, Theorem 7.2.6.
  2. ^ a b Hall 2015 Theorems 9.4 and 9.5
  3. ^ a b Hall 2015 Theorem 12.6
  4. ^ Knapp, A. W. (2003). "Reviewed work: Matrix Groups: An Introduction to Lie Group Theory, Andrew Baker; Lie Groups: An Introduction through Linear Groups, Wulf Rossmann". The American Mathematical Monthly. 110 (5): 446–455. doi:10.2307/3647845. JSTOR 3647845.
  5. ^ Hall 2015 Section 8.7
  6. ^ Hall 2015 Section 8.8
  7. ^ Hall 2015 Definition 12.4
  8. ^ Hall 2015 Proposition 12.7
  9. ^ Hall 2015 Corollary 13.20
  10. ^ Hall 2015 Chapter 12

References

  • Dixmier, Jacques (1996) [1974], Enveloping algebras, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 11, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-0560-2, MR 0498740
  • Fulton, William; Harris, Joe (1991). Representation theory. A first course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Readings in Mathematics. Vol. 129. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9. ISBN 978-0-387-97495-8. MR 1153249. OCLC 246650103.
  • Hall, Brian C. (2015), Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representations: An elementary introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 222 (2nd ed.), Springer, ISBN 978-3319134666
  • Humphreys, James E. (1972a), Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-0-387-90053-7.